WI Properties Ltd Cowboy Builders on Crooks @ MCP Law page

If you want to know what these sites are all about, Don’t miss
DAN J GINSBURY’S STUPID TOSSER SOLICITOR Page @ IWG.org Click Here

This is what we had to put up with previously, courtesy of the bent planning office at Croydon Council, Fineland Properties Ltd and their bent Lawyers IWG.
It took three MP’s and the Ombudsman to get LBC to tear down.
Now the stink is right under the window instead of merely alongside it.

And this below is what we have got to put up with now courtesy of WI Properties Ltd and their ‘Cowboy Builders’.

This pile of crap is open to the public . . . Not fenced off and easily access able to children. Any one requiring these pictures to sue WI Properties are welcome to use them. I will provide the originals . . Contact me
par84colin@hotmail.com

The ladder you can see is left out every night so . . To all burglars . . . . It shouldn’t be too difficult to get get into our property.

Mr Colin Cole
04 September 2006

Metcalfe Copeman & Pettefar

Sirs Re . Dispute 243 Portland Rd SE25 / WI Properties Ltd

I have just received a disconcerting letter from your clients WI Properties.

Which words of (and I’ll make the writing bigger in case they are blind or something.).

“neither he (WI Properties) nor their tenants of the SHOP 243 PORTLAND RD is/are to contact me, my wife, or my tenants, either in person, by phone or letter, or by another on his/her behalf, over any matter WHATSOEVER except through yourselves or any other reputable solicitor.”

. . . . . are they having TROUBLE UNDERSTANDING????

As to the matter of the leaks mentioned. Naturally I am extremely concerned about anything that endangers MY property.

Please assure your clients that I will deal with any such problems (now and in the future) with the same alacrity, diligence, anxiety, and INTEGRITY that they, their tenants and YOU have shown me so far. I will be replying at length to you (when AXA get their finger out) however, and I do assure you, your clients and their tenants (especially the tenants) will be DISMAYED. In the meantime I still await substantive answers to my many letters which should keep you busy.

As to the matter of payments I refer you to my previous letter once again of Friday, 23 June 2006 . . if your clients wish to settle the money to me outstanding from the freeholders I will be delighted to forward the sum £68.13 + £25 ground rent. . . . or of course they can continue the previous arrangement of forgoing these sums until the debt is paid off.

Inform your clients, their tenants and their “Cowboy Builders” that if I see ANY more work proceeding in the shop premises I will be applying to Croydon Crown Court for a cessation. Which shouldn’t be too difficult since I will only be applying for THE LAW to be adhered to.

ARE THERE ANY WORDS YOU DO NOT UNDERSTAND??

The replies of both your clients (NOT REQUIRED) and yourselves so far do not indicate that you have.

Colin Clifford Cole

CC Steve Parry . . Croydon Council Planning Enforcement.

CC www.croydoncouncil.info

CC www.mcp-law.org

CC AXA Complaints.

CC Nicholas Cooke . . Henderson Ins Brokers

CC Shop 243 Portland Rd

Cowboy Builders at work. 05/09/06

W I Properties Ltd ‘s unwelcome and unsolicited letter mentions a water leak and states.
“Clearly there is a high health and safety risk . . . . . “

NOT as unhealthy as having your leg sawn off it isn’t mate.

Or giving kids a pile of crap to play on.

MCP Law did answer (briefly) the following letter.

“We are investigating the matter and will get back to you as soon as possible” . . The work did stop for a few days . . But now as you can see it’s back on again.

I hope these guys pay their taxes.

Mr Colin Cole

Tuesday, 29 August 2006

David Rutter

Senior Ptnr

Metcalfe Copeman & Pettefar

Dear David Re . Dispute 243 Portland Rd SE25 / WI Properties Ltd

Please inform your clients WI Properties that their’ tenant is refurbishing the shop (once again . . déjà vu 2003) with no regard to the Party Wall act 1996.

For instance they have cut large holes in the soundproof ceiling for downlighters. . . . (CLEARLY SEEN IN PICTURE ABOVE) whether or not it is the case that this breaches the Soundproofing Act 2003. . . the PW Act still applies.

I have contacted Croydon Council Planning who assure me this is against that Soundproofing Act. They have promised to send someone round to investigate. Whether they do or not is immaterial.
If the holes are not filled in by the end of this week I will be applying to Croydon Crown Court for an Injunction to force your clients to comply with the PW Act 1996. (for which they are responsible) Also to include all the deficiencies that I claim the ceiling is subject to. Please note that no one of any consequence ie qualified to do so or with proper indemnity insurance has ever contradicted my claims and they will remain valid until your clients consult such a person. (as I have done.)

I didn’t understand the Party Wall Act in 2003, I certainly do now and will use with all the force that law allows.

Further I understand that my tenants were contacted by the builders recently. Remind your clients again

neither he nor his tenant of the SHOP 243 PORTLAND RD is/are to contact me, my wife, or my tenants, either in person, by phone or letter, or by another on his/her behalf, over any matter WHATSOEVER except through yourselves or any other reputable solicitor. “

. . . . . which includes your client’s builders.

Colin Clifford Cole

CC Steve Parry . . Croydon Council Planning Enforcement.

CC www.croydoncouncil.info

CC www.mcp-law.org

CC AXA Complaints.

CC Nicholas Cooke . . Henderson Ins Brokers

CC Shop 243 Portland Rd

Shock NEWS Horror . . Croydon ‘Cowboy Builders’ courtesy of
MCP Law client’s W I Properties Ltd. . . Click here.
The plot thickens. . . .
Cowboy Builder takes the PISS . . Click here.

Cowboy Builder takes the PISS . .

2006

These sites were created because Solicitors Ingram Winter Green and Denniss Matthews will not respond to my many letters, and because The Law Society will not investigate all this:-
The reason these sites are still here presumably, is because they are ALL not willing to answer the simple question . . “Did you or did you not conspire with your clients, S J Patel, Nathan & Ruth Teitelbaum of Fineland Properties Ltd, to deliberately LIE, CHEAT and DECEIVE in order to DEFRAUD me of my considerable claims against them?” . . well not in Court anyway. . . lying is one thing . . perjury another. All the content of these sites is based on that premise, and NONE of it has ever been denied or even contested.
For the removal of doubt, I have never called Daniel J Ginsbury “a lying, conniving, scheming piece of pig shit, low life life gutter scum”.
I merely ask the question? If all of the above is true would that make him one? Daniel Ginsbury declines to ans either the former or the latter. It is true that I accuse IWG of being a bunch of total Wankers for allowing these sites to be here and are not able to fathom a way out of this dilemma. Not worthy to call themselves Solicitors in fact.

DISCLAIMER . . Click here

My claims made on this and other web sites are based on the fact that Metcalfe Copeman & Pettefar ( MCP Law ) refuse to answer even the most basic of questions. They should have no reason, unless to do so would embarrass them or their clients in disclosure of lies, connivance, and conspiracy. In exactly the same fashion as the IWG, Denniss Matthews conspiracy. I have asked them over and over again to tell the truth but they have declined. It is reasonable and correct therefore to make the assumptions that I have and that are printed through out these sites. MCP Law still have the opportunity to refute these claims if they wish . . . Provided they can prove it that is.

In fact the reason they didn’t refute them . . . is they were true. Lisa Richardson DID Conspire to Defraud.
Their clients DID NOT buy the property at AUCTION and they DID know about the dispute when they AGREED to buy the property. In fact they bought the property BECAUSE of the dispute. . . . All this has been sworn to under OATH by Jonathan Burton Solicitor at MCP. . . . But he calls it . . . . “Was not meant to deceive.”

2006

2008

See The Impropriety of Sarah Adlam.
Click Here.

Sarah Adlam joined MCP in May 1996 and is now the Managing Partner of the Peterborough office specialising in all Civil litigation matters. She is a member of the Association of Personal Injury Lawyers and the Law Society's Personal Injury Panel.

sarah.adlam@mcp-law.co.uk

Lisa Richardson’s boss. . . . Oooh look! . . . part of the Law Society . . how convenient. . . what’s the chance of them investigating why she did nothing about HER crooked employee at the Peterborough office. . . . about a million to one I should think. . . . .

Who was harassing who ?

Letter to MCP . . . Wednesday, May 10, 2006
Also inform your clients I require and DEMAND no direct contact with them WHATSOEVER unless it is through yourselves or another reputable solicitor. (I’ll give you the benefit of the doubt for the time being.

Letter to MCP . . . . . Friday, 23 June 2006
Further to my letter earlier today I have just received a demand (not due till Sept) from WI Properties for the payment of insurance. Quite apart from my instruction in my letter to you of Wednesday, May 10, 2006,
“Also inform your clients I require and DEMAND no direct contact with them WHATSOEVER unless it is through yourselves or another reputable solicitor.”
There is also a matter of the agreements made with the previous owners of the freehold that I expect your client’s WI Properties to abide by.

Letter to MCP . . . . Tuesday, 29 August 2006
Further I understand that my tenants were contacted by the builders recently. Remind your clients again . . . “neither he nor his tenant of the SHOP 243 PORTLAND RD is/are to contact me, my wife, or my tenants, either in person, by phone or letter, or by another on his/her behalf, over any matter WHATSOEVER except through yourselves or any other reputable solicitor. “

Letter to MCP . . . . 04 September 2006
I have just received a disconcerting letter from your clients WI Properties.

Which words of (and I’ll make the writing bigger in case they are blind or something.).

. . . . . are they having TROUBLE UNDERSTANDING????

Letter to MCP . . . Tuesday, 26 September 2006

Have I got to make these letters any bigger?

Which bit . . . . are they having TROUBLE UNDERSTANDING????

Letter to MCP . . . . . Sunday, 26 November 2006
I have received two communications from your client xxxx of WI Properties.

He seems judging from the contents “we do not fully understand the bottom line requirement” to be either, incredibly naïve in his ‘understanding’ of the situation. Total arrogant in his blindness to it. Or completely deceitful in his dismissing of it. No mention of the real problems are contained within.

I am going to be generous and assume it is the former since he clearly does not ‘understand’ the terms . . . . NOT to contact us on ANY MATTER WHATSOEVER except through yourselves. . . (And while he is at it he could tell his tenant to do the same since he has been bothering our own tenant yet again this very Sat evening)

NOTICE TO ALL search engine, ISP’s, Nominet, Hosting Co’s, domain name providers and the like. ANY adverse legal content on my sites Is AT LEAST ONE YEAR OLD but more likely 2 years, and therefore is EXEMPT from prosecution in ANY form under UK Law by virtue of being OUT of STATUTE. Please ignore any threats of legal action. .They will just be ‘trying it on’..Besides it’s ALL true otherwise they would have sued me. Google search defamation limitation.Pre-action Protocol for Defamation In particular, time is always ‘of the essence’ in defamation claims; the limitation period is (uniquely) only 1 year, .www.justice.gov.uk/civil/procrules_fin/contents/protocols/prot_def.htm

MEET
The UNCREDIBLES

“I’m sick and tired of bent Solicitors conspiring with their clients . . . . . ” from FRONT page of
www.mcp-law.org

(this wasn’t shown to the Judge either)

June 2006
(six months before they admitted they had conspired to lie to me)

Watch this space. . . I am now going to splatter MCP Law all over the Internet. (do a Google . . . iwg solicitors & you will see what I mean)

I am sick and tired of bent Solicitors conspiring with their clients to defraud, to lie,& to deceive. In order to attempt to defray their clients liabilities. The property mentioned above has now had FOUR different owners since 2003. Each one dumping it on to the next with alacrity . These sleazy property Co’s buy the property cheap. (Or think it is at the time.) Then they employ bent lawyers to try and wriggle out of the liabilities, that go with this ‘bargain’ purchase. Later they regret buying it, but only because of me, and the fight I put up against them..

(the previous lot Fineland Properties Ltd actually advertise for such ‘problem’ properties [see here)
knowing that they and their solicitors IWG have a standing arrangement with Denniss Matthews to conspire and defraud in this manner)

Because of the problems with, and the dispute that has taken place since it was 1st sold.
See a brief History here.

It became more difficult to sell each time. AND a different lie had to be made in order to get round the problem of liability.

When you ask a Solicitor the SIMPLEST of questions that they decline to answer. You know you are on a winner. 1st of all I asked MCP “Did your clients know about the dispute when they purchased the property?” . . MCP still haven’t answered this . . but they did deliberately gave an answer to an entirely different question . . . as if that would do. . . . So I asked “Did you make enquiries before contract?” . . Reply “Our clients bought the property at a public auction” expecting me to think that makes the slightest difference. . . But where they seem to have come unstuck is . . when I asked . . “OK then. Which auction? When?” . . . . that became the last I have heard on the subject. For some reason and I’m pretty sure I know why, they don’t want to answer that one.

When challenged these bent solicitors then hide behind their most effective protection . .
A WALL OF SILENCE. . . you can’t penetrate that wall because the corrupt Law Society won’t intervene. . . . You’re on you’re own pal. . . and they know it. . . . . and normally that wall of silence is very effective indeed. . . .

HOWEVER . . . when you own 10 page 1 Google web-sites as I do . . THEN, that silence becomes a problem for them . . . I have given MCP Law months to come up with a reasonable explanation for the purchase of this property and they have just IGNORED IT. . . as I expected they would of course. . .

SO! they have only themselves to blame for the disdain I now intend to heap on them. . and disdain it will certainly be.
The letters Click here.

HOME