wp4b6b6c5f.png

Wxxxxxxx . . . You are the weakest link . . . . Goodbye

 

FFFFFFFF Eeeeee Limited Eeeeeee NI . . Play the Weakest Link. See if you can spot Wxxxxxxx Nnnnnnn Kxxxxxxx.

So which one of you isn’t earning enough and does a lot of little deals on the side? . . . Which one of you likes to buy properties with disputes and then denies them? . . Which one of you employs useless crooked solicitors? . . . . Which one of you has risked bringing the good name of this Company into disrepute? . . .

 

Coming soon..

I’m an Accountant Please Get Me Out of This

 

Deal or no Deal. (Play Your Cards Right Special.)

 

What the Lawyers did for Us.

 

Countdown (Crooks edition)

 

Stir Crazy, The Porridge Episode.

 

CSI Croydon (is Crap edition)

 

 

Opportunity Kxxxxxxx.

FFFFFFFF Eeeeee NI

The  Winner gets a Bentley Turbo courtesy of the MCP Law  ‘granneyrobber’ scheme . (see below) . . . . the loser leaves with . . .  NOTHING

More Dirty Tricks from MCP Law  (well extortion . . actually.)

You always expect them to charge extortionate fees . . But you don’t expect them to actually commit to extortion do you?

Click here.

Lisa Richardson

 

What did the lovely Lisa do that prevents MCP Law doing anything about this site?

Click here

If you want to know what these sites are all about, Don’t miss
DAN J GINSBURY’S STUPID  TOSSER SOLICITOR Page @ IWG.org Click Here

 

MCP Law dot Org stats take this site to major league status. Overtaking many of my other sites. . . Click here

 

Live the high life see what it’s like to be a Solicitor at MCP. Read the Metcalfe Copeman Pettefar granny robber story . . Click logo

wp85b608c0.gif

2006

These sites were created because Solicitors Ingram Winter Green and Denniss Matthews  will not respond to my many letters, and because The Law Society will not investigate all this:-
 The reason these sites are still here presumably, is because they are ALL not willing to answer the simple question . . “Did you or did you not conspire with your clients, S J Patel, Nathan & Ruth Teitelbaum of Fineland Properties Ltd,  to deliberately LIE, CHEAT and DECEIVE in order to DEFRAUD me of my  considerable claims against them?” . . well not in Court anyway. . . lying is one thing . . perjury another.  All the content of these sites is based on that premise, and NONE of it has ever been denied or even contested.
 For the removal of doubt, I have never called Daniel J Ginsbury “a lying, conniving, scheming piece of pig shit, low life life gutter scum”.
I merely ask the question? If all of the above is true would that make him one? Daniel Ginsbury declines to ans either the former or the latter. It is true that I accuse IWG of being a bunch of total Wankers for allowing these sites to be here and are not able to fathom a way out of this dilemma. Not worthy to call themselves Solicitors in fact.

 

DISCLAIMER . .  Click here

My claims made on this  and other web sites are based on the fact that Metcalfe Copeman & Pettefar ( MCP Law ) refuse to answer even the most basic of questions. They should have no reason, unless to do so would embarrass them or their clients in disclosure of lies, connivance, and conspiracy. In exactly the same fashion as the IWG, Denniss Matthews conspiracy. I have asked them over and over again to tell the truth but they have declined. It is reasonable and correct therefore to make the assumptions that I have and that are printed through out these sites. MCP Law still have the opportunity to refute these claims if they wish . . . Provided they can prove it that is.

 

In fact the reason they  didn’t refute them . . . is they were true. Lisa Richardson DID Conspire to Defraud.
Their clients DID NOT buy the property at AUCTION and they DID know about the dispute when they AGREED to buy the property. In fact they bought the property BECAUSE of the dispute. . . . All this has been sworn to under OATH by Jonathan Burton Solicitor at MCP. . . . But he calls it . . . . “Was not meant to deceive.”

2006

2008

NOTICE TO ALL search engine, ISP’s, Nominet, Hosting Co’s, domain name providers and the like. ANY adverse legal content on my sites Is AT LEAST ONE YEAR OLD but more likely 2 years, and therefore is EXEMPT from prosecution in ANY form under UK Law by virtue of being OUT of STATUTE. Please ignore any threats of legal action. .They will just be ‘trying it on’..Besides it’s ALL true otherwise they would have sued me. Google search  defamation limitation.Pre-action Protocol for Defamation In particular, time is always ‘of the essence’ in defamation claims; the limitation period is (uniquely) only 1 year,  .www.justice.gov.uk/civil/procrules_fin/contents/protocols/prot_def.htm